I see personal records (PR's) listed on a lot of the blogs I read. I have chosen not to list mine since they are all 1980’s – 90’s and most likely I won’t be able to beat any of them in the future. (I may have a shot at a couple of the ultra PR’s when I’m back in shape)
Or should I list them? What do you think?
- Bill D
- I’ve been a runner since the early 70’s, fairly competitive in the 80’s, ultra’s in the 90’s and not a lot since. I’m a member of The Woodlands Running Club and also an RRCA Certified Running Coach. I have recently formed a training group with the help of many great friends, Volte Endurance Training, with the mission to display Christian values, maintain high standards of excellence, promote integrity, respect the fundamental rights, dignity and worth of all our participants, apply and make public our knowledge of sport in order to contribute to the community and encourage all individuals, training groups and clubs. I have wonderful memories from all I’ve done and I know the best is still yet to come with all the great friends I have in the running community.
Texas Independence Relay
Blogs
Links
My Upcoming Events
Scoreboard
Charities
Blazeman 179
Archive
4 comments:
I understand that a lot of long time runners will list two sets of P.R.'s. Their P.R. and then their master's P.R.
So I would say yes and list both.
Since I only started to run a few years ago, when I hit 50, I'm going to split it into, first half century P.R. and second half century P.R.
yeah...list 'em. inquiring minds want to know. and, i second holden's theory.
Hey Bill, The rule is that you get to re-set your PR every 5 years. It happens when you get into a new agegroup. The good news is that the next race you do, what ever it might be, will be a new PR. You just have to go out there and do them....
Coach Liz
I don't list mine. They really don't tell the story of who I am as a runner. But everyone is different.
Post a Comment